Volvo S90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 68 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S90 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S90 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo 960, Volvo V90 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Vectra, Opel Calibra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 8 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |