Volvo S90 1997 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Volvo S90 engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Due to the lower power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 12.6 | |
|
The Volvo S90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Volvo S90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
| |