Volvo S90 1997 vs Audi A6 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 94 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S90 consumes 5.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 855 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S90 consumes 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 1160 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo 960, Volvo V90 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Seat Alhambra, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 7 cm longer than the Audi A6, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 551 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 2 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |