Volvo S90 1997 vs Volvo 940 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 264 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Volvo S90 engine produces 39 HP more power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Volvo 940. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S90 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S90 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 and Volvo 940 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |