Volvo S90 1997 vs Volvo 960 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Volvo S90 engine produces 24 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 11.1 | |
|
The Volvo 960 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 and Volvo 960 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo 960. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 960 has
| |