Volvo S90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Volvo S90 engine produces 31 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 9.7 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 8 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |