Volvo S90 1997 vs Ford Scorpio 1995
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 229 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 11.1 | |
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Volvo S90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Volvo S90 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |