Volvo S90 1997 vs Jaguar XJ 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 316 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S90 engine produces 60 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 56 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 12.1 | |
| Volvo S90 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the Volvo S90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 81 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is smaller, but higher. Volvo S90 is 15 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 2.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |