Volvo S90 1997 vs Jaguar XJ 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 219 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S90 engine produces 39 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.7 | |
| Volvo S90 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 81 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is smaller, but higher. Volvo S90 is 15 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 2.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |