Volvo S90 2015 vs Ford Mondeo 2014

 
Volvo S90
2015 - 2017
Ford Mondeo
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 249 HP160 HP
Torque: 350 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 seconds9.1 seconds
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S90 engine produces 89 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.3
Volvo S90 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway1260 km on highway
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 152 mm (6 inches)128 mm (5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo S90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo S90 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Dimensions

Length: 4.96 m4.87 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.44 m1.48 m
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower.
Volvo S90 is 9 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres429 litres
Volvo S90 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo S90 has 71 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2302`170
Safety:
Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 19 0007800
Pros and Cons: Volvo S90 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Ford Mondeo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv