Volvo S90 2015 vs Ford Mondeo 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 249 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo S90 engine produces 71 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 101 NM more than Ford Mondeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.1 | |
|
The Volvo S90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Volvo S90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 128 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo S90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo S90 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 9 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 429 litres | |
|
Volvo S90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S90 has 71 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |