Volvo S90 2015 vs Kia Stinger 2017
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 HP | 255 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 6 seconds | |
Kia Stinger is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S90 engine produces 6 HP less power than Kia Stinger, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Kia Stinger. Due to the lower power, Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Stinger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S90 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volvo S90 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.96 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
Volvo S90 is larger. Volvo S90 is 13 cm longer than the Kia Stinger, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 406 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1114 litres | |
Volvo S90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S90 has 94 litres more trunk space than the Kia Stinger. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Stinger. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`185 | |
Safety: | |||
The Volvo S90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 19 000 | 25 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Kia Stinger has
| |