Volvo S90 2015 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 70 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 481 litres | |
| Volvo S90 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |