Volvo S90 2015 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 45 HP more power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo V90. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo S90 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S90 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo V90, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1526 litres | |
|
Volvo V90 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238.6 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |