Volvo S90 2015 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 45 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S90 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S90 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1490 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 9 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 625 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |
