Volvo S90 2015 vs Jaguar XF 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Volvo S90) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jaguar XF) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 140 HP more power than Jaguar XF, but torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 4.3 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S90 consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60, Volvo V90 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volvo S90 and Jaguar XF are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Volvo S90 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo S90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |