Volvo S90 2020 vs Mazda 6 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volvo S90 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volvo S90 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 310 HP | 145 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 480 NM | 213 - 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 9.9 seconds | 7.8 - 10.1 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo S90 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 6. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.9 - 7.2 | 4.4 - 9.0 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Volvo S90 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`527 kg | ~ 2`066 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`971 kg | ~ 1`509 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 556 kg | ~ 557 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 35 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |