Volvo S90 1997 vs Volvo S80 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Volvo S90 is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo S80 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.9 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 130 - 272 HP | |
Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 192 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.2 seconds | 7.2 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 6.4 - 13.0 | |
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S80. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Volvo S90 is 5 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1126 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 3.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 2`071 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |