Volvo S90 1997 vs Volvo 960 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 | 2.5 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 170 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 233 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.2 seconds | 9.1 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 10.5 - 11.1 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo 960. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 and Volvo 960 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo 960. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 960 has
| |