Volvo S90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 116 - 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 175 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.2 seconds | 8.6 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 7.4 - 9.7 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 8 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 2`101 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |