Volvo S90 1997 vs Ford Scorpio 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.2 seconds | 9 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 8.3 - 12.6 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`749 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |