Volvo S90 1997 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volvo S90 is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda Xedos 9 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.9 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 146 - 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 180 - 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.2 seconds | 8.6 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 8.4 - 9.4 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda Xedos 9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S90 is 5 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 9, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 1.8 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`951 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |