Volvo S90 1997 vs Kia Clarus 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volvo S90 is available with rear wheel drive, while Kia Clarus can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.9 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 116 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 152 - 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.2 seconds | 10.7 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 9.3 - 12.0 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Clarus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 17 cm longer than the Kia Clarus, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 764 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Kia Clarus, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Kia Clarus has
| |