Volvo S90 1997 vs Jaguar XJ 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Volvo S90 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 2.9 | 3.2 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 240 - 370 HP | |
Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 316 - 525 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.2 seconds | 5.6 - 8.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 11.9 - 13.1 | |
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.31 m | |
Volvo S90 is smaller, but higher. Volvo S90 is 15 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 2.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |