Volvo S90 1997 vs Jaguar S-Type 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 | 3.0 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 240 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 300 - 390 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.2 seconds | 7.1 - 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 10.3 - 11.9 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar S-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 1 cm longer than the Jaguar S-Type, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S90 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 2.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar S-Type, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 2`182 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Jaguar S-Type has
| |