Volvo S90 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volvo S90 is available with rear wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo 166 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.9 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 204 HP | 136 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 267 NM | 187 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.2 seconds | 7.8 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.7 | 7.3 - 13.0 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 166. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volvo S90 is 15 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 1.9 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Volvo S90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |