Volvo S90 2015 vs Mazda 6 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volvo S90 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 320 HP | 145 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 480 NM | 213 - 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 9.9 seconds | 7.8 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 7.6 | 4.4 - 9.0 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Volvo S90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 489 litres | |
| Volvo S90 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`393 | ~ 2`066 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |