Volvo S90 2015 vs Skoda Superb 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volvo S90 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 320 HP | 120 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 480 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 9.9 seconds | 5.8 - 11 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo S90 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Superb. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 7.6 | 3.8 - 7.1 | |
|
Volvo S90 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. On average, Volvo S90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 152 mm (6 inches) | 148 - 149 mm (5.8 - 5.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 625 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1760 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`393 kg | ~ 2`061 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`892 kg | ~ 1`428 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 501 kg | ~ 633 kg | |
| Volvo S90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Skoda Superb. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo S90 scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo S90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |