Volvo S70 1996 vs Volvo S60 2003

	Volvo S70 1996 - 2000	Volvo S60 2003 - 2004
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	226 HP	180 HP
Torque:	310 NM	240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	7.7 seconds	8.8 seconds
	Volvo S70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S70 engine produces 46 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power Volvo S70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	11.2	9.2
	The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S70 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S70 could require 300 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	70 litres	70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	620 km in combined cycle	760 km in combined cycle
	850 km on highway	980 km on highway
	Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.72 m	4.58 m
Width:	1.76 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.39 m	1.43 m
	Volvo S70 is 14 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S70 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	470 litres	424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	1034 litres
	Volvo S70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S70 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter:	no data	11 meters
Gross weight (kg):	1`910	2`010

Safety:
Quality:	Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S70 has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€):	1200	1600
Rating in user reviews:	8.0/10	8.0/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo S70 has more power more dynamic roomier boot lower price	Volvo S60 has lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volvo S70 1996 vs Volvo S60 2003

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions