Volvo S70 1997 vs Mercedes E class 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Volvo S70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S70 engine produces 45 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mercedes E class. Thanks to more power Volvo S70 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S70 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Volvo S70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S70 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S70) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo 850 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volvo S70 is smaller. Volvo S70 is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S70 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 515 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Volvo S70 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S70 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Volvo S70 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Mercedes E class has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo S70, so Mercedes E class quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S70 has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |