Volvo S70 1996 vs Volkswagen Passat 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Volvo S70
1996 - 2000
- choose version -
Volvo S70 2.0 | 126 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 2.0 | 126 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.4 | 140 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 2.4 | 140 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.4 | 170 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 2.4 | 170 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.4 T | 193 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 2.4 T | 193 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.4 T AWD | 193 HP | Petrol | Manual | 4x4
Volvo S70 2.4 T AWD | 193 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
Volvo S70 2.5 | 144 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 2.5 | 144 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.5 20V | 170 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 2.5 20V | 170 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.5 D | 140 HP | Diesel | Manual
Volvo S70 2.5 D | 140 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.5 T | 193 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 2.5 T | 193 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 R | 250 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 R | 240 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 T-5 | 241 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 T-5 | 241 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 T-5 | 240 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 T-5 | 240 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 TDI 2.5 | 140 HP | Diesel | Manual
Volvo S70 TDI 2.5 | 140 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.0 T 20 V | 180 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.0 T 20 V | 180 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S70 2.0 20V Turbo | 226 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S70 2.0 20V Turbo | 226 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volkswagen Passat
2005 - 2010
- choose version -
Variant 1.4 EcoFuel TSI | 150 HP | Petrol | Manual
Variant 1.4 EcoFuel TSI | 150 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Variant 1.6 | 102 HP | Petrol | Manual
Variant 1.6 16V FSI | 116 HP | Petrol | Manual
Variant 1.6 16V FSI | 116 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Variant 1.8 16V TSI | 160 HP | Petrol | Manual
Variant 1.8 16V TSI | 160 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Variant 1.8 16V TSI | 160 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Variant 1.9 TDI | 105 HP | Diesel | Manual
Variant 2.0 16V FSI | 150 HP | Petrol | Manual
Variant 2.0 16V FSI | 150 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Variant 2.0 16V FSI 4Motion | 150 HP | Petrol | Manual | 4x4
Variant 2.0 16V Turbo FSI | 200 HP | Petrol | Manual
Variant 2.0 16V Turbo FSI | 200 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Variant 2.0 TDI | 140 HP | Diesel | Manual
Variant 2.0 TDI | 140 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Variant 2.0 TDI | 170 HP | Diesel | Manual
Variant 2.0 TDI | 170 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Variant 2.0 TDI 4Motion | 140 HP | Diesel | Manual | 4x4
Variant 3.2 V6 FSI 4Motion | 250 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
Body:
Sedan Estate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox:
Manual/Automatic Manual/Automatic
Engines:
2.0 - 2.5 1.4 - 3.2
Performance
Power:
126 - 250 HP 102 - 250 HP
Torque:
170 - 350 NM 148 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:
6.7 - 12.1 seconds 7.1 - 13.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
6.3 - 11.7 5.8 - 10.1
Volvo S70 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Volvo S70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. select the car version ! Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption " to learn more about fuel economy.
Dimensions
Length:
4.72 m 4.77 m
Width:
1.76 m 1.82 m
Height:
1.39 m 1.52 m
Volvo S70 is smaller.
Trunk capacity:
470 litres 603 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space.
Turning diameter:
11.3 meters 11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S70 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat.
Gross weight (kg):
~ 1`732 ~ 1`768
Safety:
Quality:
below average average
Average price (€):
1200 2400
Rating in user reviews:
8.0 /10
8.0 /10
Pros and Cons:
Volvo S70 has
Volkswagen Passat has
lower fuel consumption roomier boot higher safety fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
