Volvo C70 1997 vs Volvo XC70 2000
| Body: | Cabrio | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C70 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.5 | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo C70 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC70 2000: Automatic four-wheel drive with torque transfer to rear axle via viscous clutch when front wheels slip. Electronic traction control on front wheels (TRACS), which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is smaller. Volvo C70 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C70 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Volvo C70 has 225 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volvo C70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC70 has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Volvo C70, so Volvo C70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |