Volvo C70 1997 vs Volvo V70 1999
| Body: | Cabrio | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo C70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo C70 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo V70, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.6 | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo C70 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volvo V70 1999 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo V70 1999 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Volvo C70 and Volvo V70 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1580 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Volvo C70 has 160 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volvo C70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Volvo C70, so Volvo C70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |
