Volvo C70 1997 vs Mercedes ML 2001

 
Volvo C70
1997 - 2005
Mercedes ML
2001 - 2005
Body: CabrioCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 170 HP163 HP
Torque: 220 NM370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds12.2 seconds
Volvo C70 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo C70 engine produces 7 HP more power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 150 NM less than Mercedes ML. Thanks to more power Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.59.4
Volvo C70 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres83 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1070 km on highway
Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.64 m
Width: 1.82 m1.84 m
Height: 1.43 m1.82 m
Volvo C70 is 8 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C70 is 39 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 260 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9703`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

low
Average price (€): 22003000
Pros and Cons: Volvo C70 has
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mercedes ML has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv