Volvo C70 1999 vs SAAB 9-3 1998

 
Volvo C70
1999 - 2005
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 163 HP130 HP
Torque: 230 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds11 seconds
Volvo C70 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo C70 engine produces 33 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 53 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.79.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.7 l/100km9.1 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo C70 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C70 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway970 km on highway
700 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.63 m
Width: 1.82 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Volvo C70 is larger.
Volvo C70 is 9 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 262 litres295 litres
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo C70 has 33 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. This could mean that the Volvo C70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.7 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`790
Safety: no datano data
Quality:Volvo C70 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data SAAB 9-3 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Volvo C70, so Volvo C70 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 22002600
Pros and Cons: Volvo C70 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv