Volvo C70 1999 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 214 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo C70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo C70 engine produces 20 HP more power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Thanks to more power Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C70 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C70 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but lower. Volvo C70 is 43 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 262 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volvo C70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Volvo C70, so Volvo C70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |