Volvo C70 1999 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C70 engine produces 30 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 12.4 | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo C70 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo C70) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is smaller, but higher. Volvo C70 is 19 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C70 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 262 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |