Volvo C70 2006 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo C70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo C70 engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen EOS, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen EOS. Thanks to more power Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen EOS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C70 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C70 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen EOS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo C70 is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen EOS, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
404 litres | 380 litres | |
| Volvo C70 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo C70 (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.8 metres more than that of the Volkswagen EOS, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |