Volvo C70 2009 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Volvo C70 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen EOS, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen EOS. Despite the higher power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen EOS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo C70 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen EOS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but lower. Volvo C70 is 19 cm longer than the Volkswagen EOS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
| Volvo C70 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volkswagen EOS, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |