Volvo C70 2009 vs Renault Megane 2010

 
Volvo C70
2009 - 2013
Renault Megane
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Volvo C70) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Renault Megane) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 180 HP140 HP
Torque: 350 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds10.3 seconds
Volvo C70 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo C70 engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 155 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.38.0
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo C70 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway950 km on highway
Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.49 m
Width: 1.84 m1.81 m
Height: 1.40 m1.43 m
Volvo C70 is larger, but slightly lower.
Volvo C70 is 13 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 200 litres211 litres
Despite its longer length, Volvo C70 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. This could mean that the Volvo C70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1501`904
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 96008600
Pros and Cons: Volvo C70 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Renault Megane has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv