Volvo C70 2009 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Volvo C70 engine produces 18 HP more power than Volvo V40, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C70 consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 630 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C70 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volvo C70 2009 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo C70 2009 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo C70 is 25 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo C70 has 135 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. This could mean that the Volvo C70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |