Volvo C70 2009 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C70 engine produces 114 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 9.0 | |
| Volvo C70 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but lower. Volvo C70 is 25 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo C70 has 135 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. This could mean that the Volvo C70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |