Volvo C70 2009 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen EOS is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C70 engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen EOS, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.1 | |
| Volvo C70 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen EOS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo C70 is 21 cm longer than the Volkswagen EOS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
| Volvo C70 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volkswagen EOS, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |