Volvo C70 2009 vs Audi A5 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Audi A5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C70 engine produces 34 HP less power than Audi A5, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi A5. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.5 | |
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo C70 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C70 is 1 cm shorter than the Audi A5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C70 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 320 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 750 litres | |
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Volvo C70 has 120 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi A5, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`155 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 9600 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi A5 has
| |