Volvo C70 2009 vs Audi A5 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C70 engine produces 104 HP less power than Audi A5, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Audi A5. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C70 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C70 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Audi A5 2009 3.0 engine: The Audi 3.0 TDI CCWA is a powerful V6 diesel producing about 240 hp and is generally regarded as a solid and durable engine. With proper maintenance it can cover very high mileage, although over time several typical weak points tend to ... More about Audi A5 2009 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C70 is 1 cm shorter than the Audi A5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C70 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 750 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Volvo C70 has 120 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi A5, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`130 kg | 2`360 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`740 kg | 1`860 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 390 kg | 500 kg | |
| Volvo C70 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Audi A5. Therefore, Audi A5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Audi A5 has
| |