Volvo C70 2009 vs Audi A5 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volvo C70) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Audi A5) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C70 engine produces 24 HP less power than Audi A5, but torque is 70 NM more than Audi A5. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C70 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C70 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C70 is 1 cm shorter than the Audi A5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C70 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 750 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Volvo C70 has 120 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi A5, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Audi A5 has
| |