Volvo C70 2006 vs SAAB 9-3 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.9 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 230 HP | 150 - 255 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 350 NM | 240 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | 7.2 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.8 | 5.8 - 11.0 | |
|
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. On average, Volvo C70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C70 is 7 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
404 litres | no data | |
|
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage space. Volvo C70 has 35 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.7 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`064 | ~ 2`058 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |