Volvo C70 2006 vs Renault Megane 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo C70
2006 - 2009
Renault Megane
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.51.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 136 - 230 HP105 - 165 HP
Torque: 220 - 350 NM151 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 11.8 seconds8.7 - 13.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.1 - 9.85.7 - 8.4
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Volvo C70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.36 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.40 m1.40 m
Volvo C70 is larger.
Volvo C70 is 22 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 200 litres190 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
404 litres490 litres
Volvo C70 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 86 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.8 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`064~ 1`854
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 48002400
Pros and Cons: Volvo C70 has
  • fewer faults
Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv