Volvo C70 2006 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.0 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 230 HP | 69 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 350 NM | 93 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | 9.3 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.8 | 4.5 - 7.2 | |
|
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. On average, Volvo C70 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 3.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but lower. Volvo C70 is 82 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
404 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo C70 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Volvo C70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 3.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`064 | ~ 886 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |