Volvo C70 2009 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 220 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 400 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.6 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Volvo C70 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo C70 is 25 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo C70 has 69 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`108 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |